Just Adaptation? How the Diffusion of Norms in the Global Climate Regime Affects International Climate Politics

Delf Rothe


Politics in the international climate regime is a balancing act between intra- and intergenerational justice, as it has to account for both the needs of developing countries and those of future generations. Following a constructivist approach, this paper argues that international climate politics are heavily dependent upon the way climate change and the appropriate behavior required to prevent it are constructed collectively. The article shows how the diffusion of norms and changing images of climate change have shifted the interests of the actors under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. As a result, adaptation became more and more widely accepted as a necessary step in international climate politics in advancing the strategy of climate change avoidance. This also represents a shift from a focus on intergenerational justice as the main normative goal of the convention, to a broader aim of sustainable development that comprises both inter- and intragenerational justice.

Full Text:



Adger, Neil W. / Paavoli, Jouni / Huq, Saleemul / Mace, M.J. (eds.) (2006): Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Cambridge: MIT.

Bodansky, Daniel (2001): The History of the Global Climate Change Regime. In: Lutterbacher, Urs / Sprinz, Detlef F. (eds.): International Relations and Global Climate Change. Cambridge/London: MIT Press, 23-40.

Brunner, Ronald D. (2001): Science and the Climate Change Regime. In:

Policy Sciences. Vol. 34 (1/2001), 1-33.

Cohen, Stewart / Demeritt, David / Robinson, John / Rothman, Dale (1998): Climate Change and Sustainable Development: Towards Dialogue. In: Global Environmental Change. Vol. 8 (4/1998), 341-371.

Depledge, Joanna (2006): The Opposite of Learning. Ossification in the Climate Change Regime. In: Global Environmental Politics. Vol. 6 (1/2006), 1-22.

IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001): Climate Change 2001. SynthesisReport. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1990a): Scientific Assessment of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1990b): Climate Change. The IPCC Impacts Assessment. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Jamieson, Dale (2001): Climate Change and Global Environmental Justice. In: Miller, Clark A. / Edwards, Paul N. (eds.): Changing the Atmosphere. Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge/London: MIT Press, 247-286.

Jasanoff, Sheila (2001): Image and Imagination. The Formation of Global Environmental Consciousness. In: Miller, Clark A./ Edwards, Paul N. (eds.): Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge/London: MIT Press, 309-337.

Kjellén, Bo (2007): The New Diplomacy for Sustainable Development and Negotiations on Climate Change. In: Environmental Policy and Law. Vol. 37 (2-3/2007), 207-222.

March, James / Olsen, Johan (1998): The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. In: International Organization. Nr. 52, 943-969.

Oels, Angela (2003): The Power of Discourse in Global Climate Policy. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association ''The Construction and Cumulation of Knowledge'', Portland, 25th February – 1st March 2003.

Paavola, Jouni (2008): Science and Social Justice in the Governance of Adaptation to Climate Change. In: Environmental Politics. Vol. 17 (4/2008), 644-659.

Page, Edward A. (2008): Distributing the Burdens of Climate Change. In: Environmental Politics. Vol. 17 (4/2008), 556-575.

Paterson, Matthew (1996): Global Warming and Global Politics. London/New York: Routledge.

Payne, Rodger A. (2001): Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction. In: European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 7 (1/2001), 37-61.

Schipper, E. Lisa F. (2006): Conceptual History of Adaptation in the UNFCCC Process. In: Reciel. Vol. 15 (1/2006), 82-92.

Schröder, Heike (2001): Negotiating the Kyoto Protocol. An Analysis of Negotiation Dynamics in International Negotiations. Münster: LIT.

Tremmel, Jörg (2003): Generationengerechtigkeit – Versuch einer Definition. In: Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen (ed.): Handbuch Generationengerechtigkeit. Munich: Ökom Verlag, 27-80.

Ulbert, Cornelia (2005): Konstruktivistische Analysen der internationalen Politik: Theoretische Ansätze und methodische Herangehensweisen. In: Ulbert, Cornelia / Weller, Christoph (eds.): Konstruktivistische Analysen der internationalen Politik. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 9-34.

UNFCCC (1992): Rahmeneinkommen der Vereinten Nationen über Klimaänderungen. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/convger.pdf (19.08.2009).

UNFCCC (2001): The Marrakesh Accords & The Marrakesh Declaration. http://unfccc.int/cop7/documents/accords_draft.pdf (19.08.2009).

UNFCCC (2004): Buenos Aires Programme of Work on Adaptation and Response Measures. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_10/adopted_decisions/application /pdf/01_cp_l_16.pdf (19.08.2009).

UNFCCC (2006): The Nairobi Work Programme on Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_12/application/pdf/ sbsta_26.pdf (19.08.2009).

WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development (1987): Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wendt, Alexander (1992): Anarchy is What States Make of it. In: International Organization. Vol. 46 (2/1992), 391-425.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.3.3.493

Copyright (c) 2016 Intergenerational Justice Review

Tübingen Open Journals – Privacy Protection