Economic Analysis of Trade-offs between Justices

Stefan Baumgärtner, Stefanie Glotzbach, Nikolai Hoberg, Klara Helene Stumpf, Martin F. Quaas

Abstract


We argue that economics – as the scientific method of analysing trade-offs – can be helpful (and may even be indispensable) for assessing the trade-offs between intergenerational and intragenerational justice. Economic analysis can delineate the “opportunity set” of politics with respect to the two normative objectives of inter- and intragenerational justice, i.e. it can describe which outcomes are feasible in achieving the two objectives in a given context, and which are not. It can distinguish efficient from inefficient uses of instruments of justice. It can identify the “opportunity cost” of attaining one justice to a higher degree, in terms of less achievement of the other. We find that, under very general conditions, (1) efficiency in the use of instruments of justice implies that there is rivalry between the two justices and the opportunity cost of either justice is positive; (2) negative opportunity costs of achieving one justice exist if there is facilitation between the two justices, which can only happen if instruments of justice are used inefficiently; (3) opportunity costs of achieving one justice are zero if the two justices are independent of each other, which is the case in the interior of the opportunity set where instruments of justice are used inefficiently.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barry, B (1965): Political Argument. New York: Humanities Press.

Baumgärtner, S (2011): Normative Begründung der Nachhaltigkeitsökonomie. In: Studierenden Initiative Greening the University e.V. (eds.): Wissenschaft für nachhaltige Entwicklung! Multiperspektivische Beiträge zu einer verantwortungsbewussten Wissenschaft. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag, 273–298.

Baumgärtner, S / Faber, M / Schiller, J (2006): Joint Production and Responsibility in Ecological Economics. On the Foundations of Environmental Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Baumgärtner, S / Glotzbach, S / Stumpf, K (2011): Nachhaltigkeit als Gerechtigkeit. Eine Einführung aus Sicht der Nachhaltigkeitsökonomie. Lecture Notes.

Baumgärtner, S / Quaas M.F (2010): What is sustainability economics? In: Ecological Economics. Vol. 69 (3/2010), 445-450.

Dasgupta, P.S / Heal, G.M (1979): Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dobson, A (1998): Justice and the Environment. Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Dimensions of Social Justice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Glotzbach, S / Baumgärtner, S (in press): The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice. In: Environmental Values.

Gosepath, S (2007): Gerechtigkeit. In Fuchs, D / Roller, E (eds): Lexikon Politik. Hundert Grundbegriffe. Stuttgart: Reclam, 82–85.

Hausman, D.M (2007): The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology. 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LeGrand, J (1990): Equity versus efficiency: the elusive trade-off. In: Ethics. Vol. 100 (3/1990), 554–568.

Ott, K / Döring, R (2008): Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. 2nd edition. Marburg: Metropolis.

Pareto, V (1906): Manuale d’economia politica con una introduzione alla scienza sociale. Milano: Società editirce libraría.

Perman, R / Ma, Y / McGilvray, J et al. (2003): Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. 3rd edition. Harlow: Pearson.

Pogge, T.W (2006): Justice. In: Borchert D.M. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 862–870.

Putterman, L / Roemer, J.E / Silvestre, J (1998): Does egalitarianism have a future? In: Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 36 (2/1998), 861–902.

Robbins, L (1932): An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

Visser’t Hooft, H.P (2007): Justice to Future Generations and the Environment. Berlin and New York: Springer.

WCED [World Commission on Environment and Development] (1987): Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.

Young, H.P (1994): Equity in Theory and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.6.1.459

Copyright (c) 2016 Intergenerational Justice Review



Tübingen Open Journals – Privacy Protection