Can Youth Quotas help avoid Future Disasters?

Ivo Wallimann-Helmer

Abstract


In this paper, I argue for the following conclusions. First, quotas are not normative goals in themselves, but only a means to achieve non-discriminatory selection procedures. Second, in a democracy quotas are most plausibly used as a means to fill offices in those bodies which have a major impact on how well interests or discourses are translated into policy. Third, quotas for the young can be justified since, due to demographic development, their discourses tend to be marginalised. Fourth, youth quotas cannot be a means to ensure long-term policy-making, but they can enhance the legitimacy of longterm impacts from policy decisions taken today.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, Elizabeth (2007): Fair Opportunity in Education. A Democratic Equality Perspective. In: Ethics, vol. 117 (4), 595-622.

Brettschneider, Corey (2007): Democratic Rights. The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Brettschneider, Corey (2005): Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory. Core Values and Judicial Review. In: Political Studies, vol. 53 (2), 423-441.

Brooks Lapsley, Arthur (2012): The Papers and Writings of Abraham Lincoln. Volume Seven. Edited by The Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2659/2659-h/2659-h.htm#link2H_4_0028. Viewed 31 Oct. 2013.

Buchanan, Allen (2002): Political Legitimacy and Democracy. In: Ethics, vol. 112 (4), 689-719.

Christiano, Thomas (2010): The Constitution of Equality. Democratic Authority and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Christiano, Thomas (2004): The Authority of Democracy. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12 (3), 266-290.

Dobson, Andrew (1997): Representative Democracy and the Environment. In: William M. Lafferty, William M. / Meadowcroft, James (eds.): Democracy and the Environment. Problems and Prospects. Cheltenham/Lyme: Edward Elgar Publishing, 124-139.

Dovi, Suzanne (2011): Political Representation. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/political-representation. Viewed 5 Oct. 2012.

Dryzek, John S. / Niemeyer, Simon (2008): Discursive Representation. In: American Politician Science Review, vol. 102 (4), 481-493.

Dworkin, Ronald (1977): Taking Rights Seriously. London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Dyson, Tim (2012): On Demographic and Democratic Transitions. In: Population and Development Review, vol. 38 (Supplement), 83-102.

Ekeli, Kristian Skagen (2005): Giving a Voice to Posterity – Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People. In: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol. 18 (5), 429-450.

Kymlicka, Will (2002): Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mansbridge, Jane (1999): Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”. In: The Journal of Politics, vol. 61 (3), 628-657.

Mansbridge, Jane (2003): Rethinking Representation. In: American Political Science Review, vol. 97 (4), 515-528.

Newton, Lisa H. (1973): Reverse Discrimination as Unjustified. In: Ethics, vol. 83 (4), 308-312.

O’Neill, Onora (1976): How Do We Know When Opportunities Are Equal? In: Gould, Carol C. / Wartofsky, Marx W. (eds.): Women and Philosophy. Toward a Theory of Liberation. New York: Putnams, 334-346.

Pettit, Philip (2004): Depoliticizing Democracy. In: Ratio Juris, vol. 17 (1), 52-65.

Pojman, Louis P. (1998): The Case Against Affirmative Action. In: International Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 12 (1), 97-115.

Rawls, John (1971): A Theory of Justice. Original edition. Cambridge/MA: Belknap Press.

Rehfeld, Andrew (2006): Towards a General Theory of Political Representation. In: The Journal of Politics, vol. 68 (1), 1-21.

Rössler, Beate (1993): Quotierung und Gerechtigkeit. Ein Überblick über die Debatte. In: Rössler, Beate (ed.): Quotierung und Gerechtigkeit. Eine moralphilosophische Kontroverse. Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Verlag (Theorie und Gesellschaft, 29), 7-28.

Sher, George (1988): Qualifications, Fairness and Desert. In: Bowie, Norman E. (ed.): Equal Opportunity. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 113-127.

Stojanovic, Nenad (2013): Dialogue sur les quotas. Penser la représentation dans une démocratie multiculturelle. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

Thompson, Dennis F. (2010): Representing Future Generations. Political Presentism and Democratic Trusteeship. In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 13 (1), 17-37.

Thomson, Judith J. (1973): Preferential Hiring. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 2 (4), 364-384.

van Parijs, Philippe (2011). Just Democracy. The Rawls-Machiavelli Programme. London: ECPR Press (ECPR Press essays).

van Parijs, Philippe (1998): The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice. In: Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 27 (4), 292-333.

Vanhuysse, Pieter (2013): Intergenerational Justice in Aging Societies. A Cross-national Comparison of 29 OECD Countries. http:/www.sgi-network.org/pdf/Intergenerational_Justice_OECD.pdf. Viewed 1 Nov. 2013.

Wallimann-Helmer, Ivo (2013): Chancengleichheit im Liberalismus. Bedeutung und Funktion eines überschätzten Ideals. Freiburg: Alber.

Warren, Mary Anne (1977): Secondary Sexism and Quota Hiring. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 6 (3), 240-261.

Williams, Bernard (1973): The Idea of Equality. In: Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 230-249.

Young, Iris Marion (1990): Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24357/igjr.7.2.430

Copyright (c) 2015 Intergenerational Justice Review



Tübingen Open Journals – Privacy Protection